Driving Under the Influence

March 10, 2010

Warrant Slapped on Warrant Singer for Skipping Out on Los Angeles DUI Hearings

As this blog reported, last June 17th, Jani Lane of the 80’s rock band Warrant was arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles. The “Cherry Pie” singer is back on the headlines once again after failing to show up for two hearings pertaining to his Los Angeles DUI probation. Jani%20Lane%20DUI%202.jpg

The 46-year old singer pled no contest to his misdemeanor L.A. DUI charge and got a relatively light sentence that included three months of alcohol school, one month of community service, and three months of probation. He was due in court on February 23rd, 2010, but he didn’t show up. The judge rescheduled his appearance for February 24th, but Lane again failed to show. According to the website TMZ.com, Lane’s lawyer said that the singer is in the hospital for unknown reasons, and that he will not show up in court until next week.

The judge in Lane’s case has actually issued a warrant for the lead singer of the band Warrant – an irony not lost on Lane’s fans and snarky commentators in the media and blogosphere.

Lane’s DUI in Burbank accident occurred at the corner of Topanga and Ventura Boulevards. At the time, he got out of jail by posing a $30,000 bail. The minor traffic accident did not result in any serious injuries to any parties, fortunately.

But what if it had?

Two key sections of California Vehicle Code stipulate punishments for individuals who injure others while driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in California. These sections are 23153(a) and 23153(b).

23153(a)

This section says that if you drive DUI and cause an accident that leads to someone being injured, this will elevate an ordinary misdemeanor DUI charge to a felony DUI charge, assuming that the injury was directly or indirectly caused by the DUI driver’s use of drugs and/or alcohol.

23153(b)

This section says something quite similar. It says that if you operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) exceeding the state’s legal limit of 0.08%, and then you hit someone and cause an injury or otherwise violate the law and cause an injury, this can be charged as a felony. 23153(b) also lays out the punishments that can be imposed, which range from jail time to forced restitution to a victim (and/or the victim’s family) to steep fines and court costs.

What should you do if you or a family member has been charged with driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in Southern California?

A good attorney can be immeasurably helpful. Without excellent legal representation, you could wind up with much steeper penalties than you might otherwise.

March 1, 2010

Southern California DUI Blogosphere Lights Up As Son of Recently Deceased “Deadliest Catch” Captain Gets Arrested For DUI in Seattle

by Michael Kraut

Online blogs and websites that cover celebrity Los Angeles DUI news have been fiercely debating the arrest of Jake Harris, the 24-year-old son of the late Captain Phil Harris, a fish boat captain who appeared on multiple seasons of Discovery Channel’s “Deadliest Catch.”

According to Washington State Troopers, Harris had been driving on a suspended license and had gotten involved in a hit and run accident prior to his arrest. After a motorist reported an out-of-control driver on interstate 5, the police ID’d Harris’ vehicle and, using aerial assistance, pulled him over. Harris was arrested at the scene and charged with hit and run as well as a DUI.

Fortunately, no one was reportedly injured in the earlier hit and run accident, and Harris himself seems to have escaped uninjured as well, although he remains behind bars as of the publishing of this blog post. Harris’ situation does raise some interesting issues, however.

For instance, what would happen if someone drove DUI in Pasadena on the 5 Freeway and got involved in a hit and run accident that actually hurt someone else?

If you commit a hit and run DUI in Pasadena, you might be charged by prosecutors for violating California Vehicle Code Sections 23153(a) and/or 23153(b). These state laws stipulate that anyone who injures another person in a DUI crash can have his charge raised from a simple misdemeanor to a felony, which is a much more serious charge. If your BAC level is above 0.08%, and you hurt another person in a DUI crash (hit and run or not), your punishments can include forced restitution to the injured victim and/or victim’s family, a lengthy prison sentence, severe fines and court costs, hiked up insurance rates, strict probation terms, mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device, and so forth.

Obviously, defendants would like to avoid (or at the very least plead down) these charges. But without a sophisticated and experienced attorney who understands how prosecutors charge people for driving under the influence in Pasadena, you could run into serious trouble — even if exonerating facts are on your side.

Explore Your Options

February 22, 2010

Serial Traffic Offender Kills Girl in DUI Crash: Parallels Other Cases of Southern California DUI Homicide

by Michael Kraut

Driving under the influence in Long Beach (or anywhere else in Southern California) is a serious criminal act — one that can lead to horrific tragedies. Sadly, a 48-year-old man, Eddie Lumpkin, stands implicated in a recent and frighteningly brutal DUI homicide — this case out of Chicago.

On Tuesday, Lumpkin — who had been decorated with over three dozen traffic offenses over the past 20 years, according to the Chicago Sun-Times – plowed his van into six-year-old Jada Washington, killing her. Washington’s aunt, Tiuette Richardson, was severely hurt as well.

Despite all his traffic offenses (his latest occurred just weeks ago on January 31st, when he blew through a stop sign), amazingly, Lumpkin still had an Illinois drivers’ license. According to the Chicago Tribune, “The court records provide little information about why the tickets were dropped, but it could have been a lack of evidence, the failure of police officers to show up in court or any number of other things.”

Lumpkin has been charged with two counts of aggravated DUI as well as reckless homicide.

The laws concerning DUI murder in Southern California differ somewhat from the applicable Illinois laws. If Lumpkin had a hit and killed a six-year-old while driving under the influence in Long Beach, for instance, he could be charged with Gross Vehicular Manslaughter while Intoxicated (CA Penal Code Section 191.5(a)).

To win a case like this, prosecutors would have to show four things:

1. Lumpkin was under the influence of alcohol or drugs and drove with a BAC of 0.08% or higher.

2. While driving DUI in Long Beach (or anywhere else in Southern California), Lumpkin committed a misdemeanor, traffic offense or other act that could lead to death.

3. Lumpkin performed this misdemeanor, infraction or act with what’s known as “gross negligence” — a standard of carelessness that’s beyond ordinary inattention or bad judgment.

4. The gross negligence led to the death of the six-year-old girl.

Cases of Gross Vehicular Manslaughter while DUI in Southern California can become incredibly complicated and can stretch out over months, if not years.

The consequences of a less than exact defense could lead to extreme punishments. So, if you or a loved one stands accused of a DUI in Long Beach — whether you are contending with a simple misdemeanor or a complex charge like vehicular manslaughter — you likely need competent and experienced legal counsel.

February 17, 2010

Double Trouble: Twin felony Los Angeles DUI charges handed out after two DUI drivers crash into each other

by Michael Kraut

On January 23rd, two individuals both driving under the influence of alcohol in Burbank collided into one another, causing minor injuries and damage. According to investigating officer, James Laforce, here is what happened:

A car traveling eastbound on Sherman Way attempted a U-turn, when an oncoming truck plowed into it, knocking the car onto a nearby curb. The truck, meanwhile, slammed into a Ford Mustang parked nearby. The truck driver — along with his passenger — fled the scene, but both men were apprehended and arrested shortly thereafter for trying to break into someone’s residence.

The truck driver got tagged for a felony hit and run charge; he is currently being investigated for a misdemeanor DUI charge. Meanwhile, the 20-something-year-old woman who had been driving the car got taken to hospital for minor injuries. Reports suggest that neither her, nor her passengers, suffered any life-threatening injuries. Nevertheless, the woman was hit with a felony Los Angeles DUI charge.

Laforce had this to say about the accident: “it was ugly… they are lucky they are alive.”

In this Burbank DUI instance, fortunately no one got seriously injured or killed. But what happens if someone dies in a Southern California DUI crash? What kinds of charges might a driver face?

The answer, obviously, depends on the circumstances of the accident. California Penal Code Section 191.5(a) describes the charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. To prove this kind of charge, prosecutors must show four key things:
1) The person drove a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08% or higher; or otherwise clearly drove under the influence of a drug;
2) The person committed a driving infraction or unlawful act — such as a misdemeanor — that could potentially cause someone to die;
3) The driver not only committed this unlawful act or infraction, but he or she did so with gross negligence;
4) This gross negligence led to someone’s death.

DUI murder charges (a.k.a. Watson murders) carry even stiffer penalties and harsher jail sentences than do charges of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

Whether you’re facing a (relatively) minor misdemeanor Burbank DUI charge, or you’ve been arrested for gross vehicular manslaughter while under the influence, you are entitled to a sound and competent defense. Given how much is at stake, it makes sense to invest in high quality legal representation.

February 2, 2010

Southern California DUI Community Notes Bengals Linebacker’s DUI Troubles

by Michael Kraut

On Friday, Southern California DUI blogs buzzed with the news that homegrown sports hero, Ray Maualuga, had been arrested for DUI in Covington Kentucky. The 23-year-old Maualuga — who was drafted by the Bengals in 2009 out of the University of Southern California — reportedly had been driving with a BAC of .157 when his 2003 Pontiac spun out of control and smashed into a parking meter and two cars. No one was injured. But Maualuga did cause minor but significant property damage. The Bengal’s linebacker tested at nearly twice the Kentucky (and California) legal limit of 0.08%. He is scheduled to return next month to Kenton County District Court for a hearing on the matter. In addition to the gamut of potential court imposed penalties, Maualuga faces the possibility of being disciplined by the NFL for violating the league’s personal conduct policy.

This morning, Maualuga Tweeted to his Twitter followers about his remorse over what happened. He vowed to “do everything in my power to gain ur trust back! I will definitely learn from this!”

Whether you’re pulled over for DUI in Covington, Kentucky or DUI in Pasadena, California, the consequences of conviction can be life changing. Here in Southern California, the basic relevant laws are encapsulated in two sections of the California Vehicle Code: sections 23152 (a) and (b). The first section stipulates that a driver pulled over by the police while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be placed under arrest and charged with a misdemeanor or felony. If the Court convicts, he or she will face punishments like jail time, license suspension, points on the license, and fines and court costs. As of January 1, 2010, even a first-time Pasadena DUI offender will be required to install something called an interlock ignition device (IID) in his or her vehicle. This mechanism prevents a driver from starting the engine unless he or she blows into a Breathalyzer like device first.

Section 23152 (b) stipulates that a driver who operates a vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of greater than 0.08% can be arrested for DUI. Officers use a number of tests to determine this BAC number — including urine analysis, breathalyzers, and blood tests. Each of these common methods has pluses and minuses.

If you’re arrested for a Pasadena DUI, it can help to discuss your matter with a qualified and proven lawyer. After all, perhaps your BAC test was biased, inaccurate, or improperly interpreted. The only way to build a superior defense is to analyze all relevant facts in context. Most Pasadena DUI attorneys spend their entire careers only arguing for defendants. As a result, they may be blinded to certain solutions.

January 4, 2010

New Year’s Eve Arrests for DUI in Los Angeles Way Up over 2009 Numbers

by Michael Kraut

According to California Highway Patrol (CHP) statistics, 108 people were arrested for DUI in Los Angeles County over New Year’s Eve (from 6:01 PM on 12/31/09 through 6 AM on 01/01/2010). In 2009 — one year ago — only 430 people were arrested. These trends were statewide. In 2009, 430 people were arrested in all of California for driving over the influence on New Year’s Eve; in 2010, 527 people were busted.

But although state arrest numbers went up by 97, crash fatality numbers went way down. In 2009, 11 people died on California’s freeways on New Year’s Eve; in 2010, only six died.

The New Year’s Eve arrests followed on the heels of a statewide campaign to crack down on driving under the influence in Southern California and Northern California. As of December 28, 2009, over 1,400 people had been snagged in L.A. County alone for DUI violations. And over the Christmas holiday weekend, the CHP arrested over 200 people in LA for driving under the influence.

CHP officials have trumpeted these numbers as evidence that their statewide crackdown saved lives and kept California roads safer.

When CHP agents arrest people for driving under the influence in Long Beach, what precisely does that mean, legally speaking? California Vehicle Code Sections 23152 (a) and 23152 (b) spell out precisely what constitutes a DUI in Southern California. Section 23152 (a) stipulates that a driver operating a car, truck or other motor vehicle on state roads while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be subject to arrest; if convicted, he or she will face an array of unpleasant punishments, which can include driver’s license suspension, jail time, court costs and fines, points on a driver’s license, and now — as of 01/01/2010 — a mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device (IID) even for first time Long Beach or Glendale DUI offenders.

Section 23152 (b) stipulates that it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle if your blood alcohol concentration is above 0.08%.

Crafting a methodical and proper legal defense to charges of driving under the influence in Long Beach (or elsewhere in Southern California) can prove immensely challenging, even if the facts are on your side.

December 7, 2009

5 Ways to Avoid Having a Los Angeles DUI (or Other Driving-Related Problem) Disrupt Your 2009 Holiday Season

by Michael Kraut

#1. To avoid accidentally driving under the influence in Southern California, plan ahead.

Holidays can be times of frivolity and spontaneity, but they can also be peculiarly dangerous. One of the most time-tested driving tips is also the Boy Scout motto: be prepared.

Very few people who get arrested for driving over the legal limit in California (0.08% BAC) start out their nights hoping to spend hours locked behind bars fretting about their futures. To be safe, you must understand your habits and proclivities and plan accordingly. For instance, if you are charged with a DUI in Pasadena and your in-laws enjoy carousing at a local tavern, line up a designated driver before the fun starts. If you wait until the middle of the evening to develop a back up plan, your judgment may by then be skewed and you may make dumb decisions that could lead you down a dangerous path.

#2. Avoid crazy drivers on the road.

Again, this is common sense. But it’s common sense uncommonly practiced. On holidays like New Year’s Eve, the Southern California freeways can become exceptionally dangerous. For example, anyone who finds themselves to being charged with a DUI in Glendale, runs the risk of being jailed. Because of the dangers of DUIs on the street, it is vital to avoid driving late at night, if possible, particularly between the hours of midnight to 3 AM and especially on weekends.

#3. Don’t drive while talking on a cell phone or texting. Often times, this is used as probable cause to detain some one during an investigation. For example, if a person is texting and also DUI in Beverly Hills, then an officer may stop the person to question them based upon the texting alone. Then, the officer may learn more facts to believe that the person is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Recent research out of places like Virginia Tech, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety suggest that driving while talking on a cell phone or texting can be a lethal mistake, even if you’re using a hands-free headset. The reason is that your mind is still distracted by the call — it’s not just a matter of holding something against your ear or not — it’s a matter of what your brain is paying attention to. Multiple independent surveys bear out this hypothesis. It doesn’t matter whether you’re driving with or without a headset — you’ll be dangerously distracted either way.

#4. Keep your car tuned up and your eye on the weather.

Although Southern California is not known for its frequent snowstorms, the month of December often sees quite unusual weather. Witness the burst of rain that soaked Southland freeways and byways today. Rain loosens up dirt and oil. The slickness of this slurry of water, oil, dirt, and debris can turn freeways into deathtraps.

#5. Review the laws regarding Southern California DUI.

Studying Los Angeles DUI laws may sound like a less than ideal way to spend your holiday. But studies show that attending to potential dangers can actually be protective. A recent federal study showed that individuals who installed monitors to measure how much electricity their homes used subsequently cut back spontaneously on energy use by about 15% or 20%. The same kind of feedback response effect is the basis for biofeedback, meditation, and the relaxation system known as the Alexander Technique. The idea is that — by bringing your attention to the fact that California Vehicle Code Section 23152 (a) and 23152 (b) stipulate that drivers who operate motor vehicles with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher can be arrested and charged with a misdemeanor and can receive incredibly steep fines, a one-year California driver’s license suspension, court costs, mandatory alcohol school, probation, and even jail time — you may subconsciously adopt more judicious behavior when you get behind the wheel.

If, however, you or a loved one has been arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California over the 2009 holiday season…

December 2, 2009

Pamela Bach, ex-wife of Baywatch superstar David Hasselhoff, tagged for driving under the influence in Los Angeles

by Michael Kraut

The AP has reported that Pamela Bach was arrested on charges of DUI in Southern California on Saturday night on the 101 freeway. The police report said that the former Baywatch beauty and (now ex-wife of David Hasselhoff) blew a BAC level of 0.13% or 0.14% — significantly over the state’s legal limit of 0.08%. She was booked at the Van Nuys jail and released after posting a $15,000 bond. Bach confessed to her misjudgment in a public statement: “I am remorseful and mortified. I am going through a really difficult time between David being in the hospital and going through the divorce.” Pamela%20Bach%20DUI.JPG

According to the AP, Bach had been arrested in 2007 for a hit and run — a charge which was later dropped when she reached a settlement with the woman whom she hit. She was also on probation for a DUI in Southern California she received back in August.

As a savvy Van Nuys DUI attorney would tell you, the legal defense for someone charged multiple times with DUI in California can be exponentially complicated. Multiple violations of California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) and 23152(b) can result in increased penalties.

First-time DUI offenders face serious-enough penalties, including six weeks minimum alcohol school, suspension of driver’s license for a year, 4 hours in police custody, fines, and other assorted penalties. But the punishments get much worse with multiple convictions. Second time offenders can receive a two-year driver’s license suspension, a minimum of 18 months in alcohol school, and a mandatory four-day jail sentence. A third time offender can get a three-year driver’s license suspension, 18 months minimum in DUI school, and a minimum of 120 days in police custody. A four time DUI offender (within 10 years) can get a minimum of 180 days behind bars (just for a misdemeanor DUI) and may have to pay additional fines and penalties.

If you or a friend or loved one has been arrested for Burbank DUI or DUI anywhere else in Southern California, look to the services of a qualified attorney.

November 27, 2009

Los Angeles DUI Charges against John Kerry’s Daughter Dropped

by Michael Kraut

Last week, Alexandra Kerry, the 36-year old daughter of senator and former presidential candidate John Kerry, got pulled over for driving under the influence in Los Angeles. On Monday, however, the city prosecutor’s office opted to drop the case against the documentary filmmaker, citing the fact that her blood alcohol (BAC) level was 0.06% — 0.02% under California’s legal limit of 0.08%.

People Magazine broke the story of Kerry’s arrest last week; nevertheless, many details have still yet to be made public. A spokesman for the LAPD said that Kerry posted a $5,000 bail and that she was cited for having an expired registration. She was booked at a Hollywood police station, and a court date had been set for December 10. No other drivers were allegedly involved in the incident, and no one was injured.

As a reputable Southern California DUI attorney will tell you, the key law that governs cases like Kerry’s is California Vehicle Code Section 23152 — specifically sections 23152(a) and 23152(b). The first section stipulates that if you operate a car, truck, or other vehicle while under the influence of narcotics or alcohol, you can be booked for a criminal act. The section also lays down punishments for violating this law, which include license suspension, serious fines and court costs, and jail time. Section 23152(b) stipulates that one may not drive a car, truck, or other motor vehicle with a BAC of more than 0.08%. (Since Alexandra Kerry — as we mentioned above — only had a BAC of 0.06%, it therefore would have been very difficult for prosecutors to build a substantial case against her.)

Not all charges of driving under the influence in Southern California are as easily met, however. If you or a loved one faces similar charges — or even charges complicated by injuries, property damage, or other factors — it may behoove you to connect ASAP with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers.

For years, Attorney Kraut worked as Deputy District Attorney for the city of Los Angeles, during which time he prosecuted some very tough DUI cases. He has since switched over to representing criminal defendants, and he uses his knowledge of procedure and law to develop superior strategies for his clients. Attorney Kraut has an impressive pedigree — including a degree from Harvard Law School. And he has proven himself many times over both in settlement hearings and at trials. Given the severity of your charge, it makes sense to work with one of the best attorneys that the city has to offer.

November 18, 2009

Winner of “The Bachelor: London Calling” Arrested for Los Angeles DUI

by Michael Kraut

On Saturday, November 14, Shayne Lamas, the 24-year-old reality star who won the Season 12 of “The Bachelor: London Calling” was arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles after she failed a breathalyzer test.

According to reports from outlets like E! Online, the ingénue/celebutante drove through a DUI checkpoint, completely confident of passing. Unfortunately for her, she blew a reading well above California’s legal limit of 0.08%. In a statement to the press afterwards, Lamas apologized for her lack of judgment and said that she would never “condone drinking and driving.” Her court date has been scheduled for December 9.

Had Lamas been able to discuss her checkpoint stop with an experienced Los Angeles DUI lawyer, she might have been able to handle the situation more effectively. Fortunately for her, from the facts sketched out in the E! Online story, Lamas may have numerous legal options at her disposal.

In particular, the breathalyzer test that she failed could have been compromised or inaccurate. Only a thorough investigation into her Southern California DUI arrest could resolve the issue. However, problems with these kinds of tests abound. Consider:

1) Breathalyzer tests don’t distinguish between women and men.

2) They also can’t distinguish between ethanol and other compounds that chemically mimic ethanol.

3) Breathalyzers often yield false positives, particularly when they’re badly calibrated; misread; handled improperly; or awkwardly administered.

4) Different BAC readings can show up depending on how hard you blow into a breathalyzer. A shallow breath tends to yield a lower BAC reading than does a deeper breath.

5) Officer bias and error can also throw off a breathalyzer result.

If you or a loved one has been charged with driving under the influence in Los Angeles or elsewhere in Southern California, Attorney Michael Kraut can provide a free consultation to help you assess your rights and options. Attorney Kraut spent years working for the city of Los Angeles as a respected and feared prosecutor. He now draws upon his deep understanding of the psychology of prosecutors to deliver results time and again for his DUI clients. Attorney Kraut is also extremely well credentialed — he is, among other things, a Harvard Law School graduate — and he has won a reputation for fearless and relentless advocacy for his clients.