DUI Accidents

December 4, 2009

Tiger Woods’ big crash — not a celebrity Los Angeles DUI catastrophe — but an embarrassing incident (and media cat-nip) nevertheless

Last Wednesday, golf superstar and billionaire Tiger Woods smashed into a fire hydrant near his Orlando home, causing over $3,000 in damage, according to the AP. Although this was not a Southern California DUI accident, the blogosphere (and even the mainstream media) has jumped all over the story, in part due to salacious details emerging about Woods’ alleged affair with a cocktail waitress named Jamie Grubbs. The Orlando police released a six page accident report which included over 100 photos of Woods’ damaged Cadillac Escalade. According to the AP story, Woods’ vehicle “rubbed up against a line of bushes, crossed over a curb onto a grass median and into a row of hedges before swerving left into a hydrant and crashing into the tree.”

Woods has hunkered down — away from the public spotlight — after issuing a cryptic public apology about his “transgressions.”

Although Woods was not charged with DUI in Southern California — the incident, after all, occurred in Orlando, Florida, and the only charge was “careless driving” (which merited a flimsy fine of $164 and four points on his license) — the consequences for his endorsement career could be significant.

Prior to this incident and these allegations, Woods had maintained a relatively bulletproof public persona — that of a polite and thoroughly wholesome sportsman. Although police made no allegations that Woods had been drinking or otherwise intoxicated at the time of the crash, the golf pro did exhibit signs that could be construed as potentially indicating intoxication, at least according to the metrics used by California Highway Patrol officers. These symptoms of Souther California DUI include:

Disheveled appearance

Bad driving

Obviously impaired motor skills

Slow responses to officer questions

Bloodshot, watery, or unfocused eyes

Disorientation

Many drivers exhibit these DUI-like symptoms independent of their level of alcohol intoxication. For instance, if someone gets physically sick or doesn’t get a lot of sleep, he or she can exhibit many if not all of the above symptoms. And certain medications can even make people smell like alcohol even though they’ve had nary a drop to drink.

All this is to say that defending a Beverly Hills DUI matter can become exceedingly complicated and technical. To that end, if you’ve been arrested for misdemeanor Los Angeles DUI, you may need a veteran attorney to represent you. Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers has been working in the Southern California legal system for over a decade — first as a prosecutor (Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles) and now as a criminal defense lawyer. Since he’s worked on behalf of both sides, he brings a unique perspective to bear on each and every matter. And his deep understanding of how the prosecution operates often comes in handy when he develops strategic approaches for his clients.

November 23, 2009

Red Flags That Indicate You May Be At Risk for Southern California DUI

by Michael Kraut

Given the potentially devastating penalties that could result if you’re convicted of a Southern California DUI charge, you want to exercise an abundance of caution before getting behind the wheel after you’ve consumed any amount of alcohol. What are some ‘red flags’ that indicate that you might want to turn to a designated driver or take a cab?

1. You fail self administrated “roadside sobriety tests.”

Tests like the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk-the-line test, the Rhomberg test, and the finger-to-the-nose test may be useful for certain individuals in certain situations. But remember that just because you pass any of these tests (or even all of them) with flying colors does not necessarily mean that you are sober and ready to get behind the wheel.

2. You fail a self-administered breathalyzer test.

Breathalyzers can sometimes give a fair bead on your BAC level. As any Southern California DUI attorney will tell you, the normal threshold for DUI in California is a BAC of 0.08%. But just because you blow a BAC of less than that doesn’t mean that you’re necessarily sober and ready to drive. Of course, blowing a BAC of greater than 0.08% doesn’t necessarily mean that you ARE above the state’s legal limit either. In other words, these tests do not have a wonderful track record for accuracy; and in fact false-positive test results often lead to unfair Southern California DUI convictions.

3. You notice dispositional changes.

If you experience symptoms such as bloodshot eyes; an inability to complete sentences; a tendency to slur speech; impaired motor skills; or a retarded ability to complete sentences, definitely think twice before getting behind the wheel. Perhaps more tellingly — if people around you hint or joke that you’re acting drunk — this should be taken as a huge sign to exercise caution.

4. You are under 21.

If you’re a minor and you have even a slight amount of alcohol in your system, you can be tagged for driving under the influence in Southern California. Anyone under age needs to be extra cautious not to get behind the wheel in such situations.

5. You notice any intolerance to alcohol.

Your body’s ability to metabolize alcohol changes. Individuals with diabetes, insulin resistance, or even a common cold can be far more susceptible to the effects of alcohol than healthy individuals, for instance. Other factors that can influence your tolerance include your stress level, your weight, your gender, your level of fatigue, whether or not you consumed foods before drinking, whether you recently consumed narcotics or medications, and so forth.

To summarize, there is no ‘standard candle’ to guide you in all situations. Frustratingly, even if you follow the state’s posted guidelines for responsible driving, you may still potentially encounter legal problems.

Here’s a useful rule of thumb: always exercise an abundance of caution. Be very conservative when you make decisions about whether to drive or not. If you have any doubt about whether you may be too intoxicated to get behind the wheel, don’t drive. Call a cab. Ask a friend to drive you home. But don’t risk potentially injuring yourself, hurting others, destroying property and sidelining your future.

If you or a friend or family member has been arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California, Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers can provide guidance. Attorney Kraut spent many years working as a Los Angeles DUI prosecutor, and he understands how to craft a superior defense as a result of his prosecutorial experience. Attorney Kraut is an alumnus of Harvard Law School, and he’s committed to compassionate and attentive client care.

November 16, 2009

Driving Under the Influence in Southern California and Other Dangerous Activities

by Michael Kraut

Most people are well aware of the dangers of driving under the influence in Los Angeles. However, alcohol intoxication appears to be just one of many factors that predispose drivers to hurt themselves and others.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), nearly a quarter of the 6+ million car accidents reported every year in the U.S. can be traced back to driver distraction. The NHTSA, in conjunction with the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), the American Automobile Association (AAA), and other foundations and organizations have conducted extensive studies to determine key distracting factors. They found that common distractions include:

• Eating in the car
• Changing the radio or CD player
• Talking/interacting with other passengers
• Grooming/application of makeup
• Texting/cell phone use
• Rubbernecking
• Fatigue

Researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) also analyzed what causes driver distractions. These scientists examined 2,700 crashes and found that the number one distraction was rubbernecking — which caused 16% of the accidents in the study. Driver fatigue accounted for 12%. “Looking at scenery or landmarks” accounted for 10%. Passenger distractions caused 9%. Changing a radio station or CD caused 7%. Cell phone use caused 5%. Failure to keep “eyes on the road” caused 4.5%. Daydreaming lead to 4%, as did eating and drinking; and adjusting car controls. Distracting weather conditions; medical/emotional problems; “unknowns”; animal distractions; and problems with directions/maps accounted for the other 10% of crashes.

As a reputable Southern California DUI attorney would readily admit, just because an array of factors can distract drivers doesn’t exculpate people who take to Los Angeles’ freeways and surface streets while clearly impaired. However, the sheer diversity of possible distractions provides a sobering reminder of the scope of driver fallibility. In other words, to clamp down on unnecessary deaths, injuries, and property damage, we need to do more than just set up DUI checkpoints and hope for the best. We need to launch a broader campaign to get people to pay closer attention to the task of driving and to disincentivize people from engaging in behaviors that studies show increase risk for accidents and injuries.

Many symptoms of Southern California DUI parallel behaviors of distracted individuals. For instance: incoherent speech, poor motor skills, fumbling, and inattentive/incoherent verbal responses afflict both inattentive drivers and drivers operating under the influence of alcohol.

If you or a loved one has been arrested for a Los Angeles DUI, connect today with the attorneys here at Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Attorney Michael Kraut spent many years in the trenches working for the city of Los Angeles on the prosecutorial side prior to switching over to representing defendants. He utilizes his wealth of expertise about how the prosecution operates to build strategically focused, results-oriented investigations. And as a Harvard Law School graduate, Attorney Kraut has the credentials to help you and your family get good results.

November 10, 2009

Driving Under the Influence Versus Driving While Texting: Which Is More Dangerous?

by Michael Kraut

For decades, public transportation authorities have warned us that driving under the influence in Los Angeles (or anywhere else) can increase your risk for getting into an auto accident by as much as four times. Few transportation safety experts would argue that getting behind the wheel with a blood-alcohol content of 0.08% or higher would be anything other than a catastrophic error. However, when it comes to the subject of driving while text messaging, people appear less willing to criticize the behavior — even though many good and reliable studies clearly demonstrate that driving while texting is perhaps even more dangerous than driving under the influence in Southern California.

Consider a recent study conducted by Virginia Tech’s Transportation Institute that found that truckers who texted were 23 times more likely to get into accidents than were non-distracted truckers. Another study from the University of Utah found that driving while texting was at least twice as dangerous as driving under the influence.

Every state has serious laws on the books against driving while under the influence. But in some states, it’s not yet illegal to drive while texting. In other words, there’s a disconnect between the law and the science / statistics. If driving while texting is more dangerous than DUI, why would driving while texting be legal anywhere?

If you’ve been pulled over for driving while texting or driving under the influence in Los Angeles, you may require the services of a distinguished and well credentialed Los Angeles DUI attorney, like Michael Kraut.

November 10, 2009

Los Angeles DUI Suspect Charged with Smashing into Cop Car In North Hollywood

by Michael Kraut

According to a CBS news report, 41-year-old Silviano Ramirez has been arrested for misdemeanor DUI with injury in Los Angeles following a late evening collision near Lankershim Boulevard. At around 9:30 PM, Ramirez — who was later tested to have a BAC level of 0.15% — attempted a non-sanctioned U-turn and plowed into a patrol car, injuring both police officers inside and giving one of them a broken nose. The cop car ricocheted into a third vehicle, sending the driver of that vehicle to the hospital with injuries.

Ramirez was arrested at the scene and charged not only with driving under the influence in Los Angeles but also with driving on a suspended/restricted California license. He is scheduled to appear in Van Nuys Superior Court on Friday to face an arraignment.

You don’t need a Southern California DUI lawyer to understand that crashing into a cop car while driving with a BAC of nearly twice the state’s legal limit is asking for trouble. Yet although the suspect stands accused of DUI with injury, the terms of his punishment could vary substantially, depending on how badly he injured the two police officers and the other driver.

This is a key point. In most people’s minds, all Los Angeles DUI injury cases “rhyme” — that is, they’re all punished roughly equally. However, the law — as defined by two critical codes, California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (a) and California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (b) — stipulates a diverse set of possible punishments. To convict you of a felony injury DUI, a prosecutor must make a special and concerted effort to show the following:

* You drove under the influence of alcohol or drugs
* You drove with a BAC of 0.08% or higher (can be less if, for instance, you’re under 21 years of age)
* You disobeyed a traffic law (in this case, Ramirez conducted an illegal U-turn, so that would likely qualify as a violation)
* The illegal driving act directly led to the injury in question
A superficial assessment of this Southern California DUI case suggests that the defendant may have a particularly difficult road to hoe. For one, he hit police officers. Secondly, he injured the officers. He also made an illegal U-turn. Finally, he allegedly drove while on a suspended/restricted license.

Nevertheless, a methodical and battle tested Los Angeles DUI attorney could help him craft a logical and workable defense strategy.

October 29, 2009

Mel Gibson Finally Puts His Southern California DUI Behind Him

by Michael Kraut

On Tuesday, movie star and director Mel Gibson finally saw his July 2006 Southern California DUI conviction expunged from his record. Gibson’s arrest in the summer of 2006 riveted the nation after Gibson allegedly threw an anti-Semitic tantrum subsequent to his being taken into custody, in which he unleashed a fusillade of insults and racist remarks, including saying that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” Mel%20Gibson%20DUI.jpg

Judge Lawrence Mira consented to clear Gibson of his Los Angeles DUI charge because the actor/director had conformed to the terms of his probation, which included attending AA meetings, paying nominal fines, and avoiding further arrests for driving under the influence.

Had Gibson consulted a knowledgeable Los Angeles DUI lawyer after he had been pulled over on PCH for driving around 85 mph, he likely would have been advised against behaving rudely and aggressively towards the deputy officer who made the arrest.

That being said, being courteous to an arresting officer does not mean being compliant or submissive. In fact, if you’re overly forthcoming about your activities, you can exacerbate your legal woes. Admitting to “only having had a few drinks,” for instance, can significantly complicate your case.

Under what conditions can a suspect refuse an alcohol test? The law is murkier than most people realize. You can refuse under certain circumstances; but under other circumstances, refusal can constitute a criminal offense. For instance, if you’re on probation for driving under the influence of Los Angeles, or if you’ve just been arrested, you must take a test. (And if you’ve been arrested under suspicion of drug use, you may also have to take a urine test.)

You can also be penalized if you delay taking a test. That said, if the conduct of the arresting officer contributed to or caused the delay, then said delay may not actually constitute a refusal, legally speaking. If the police do not advise a suspect about penalties for refusal, the court can choose to ignore a refusal, even if one did in fact take place. According to Southern California law, arresting officers can obtain blood samples for BAC testing by force if need be. For instance, if a suspect has passed out at the wheel and has evinced signs of DUI, an officer can take a sample — even in spite of the suspect’s unconsciousness.

For help navigating the complexities that have resulted from your DUI arrest, turn to attorney Michael Kraut. For many years, attorney Kraut worked as a DUI prosecutor in Los Angeles. He knows how to critically dissect prosecutorial arguments and brings to bear a tremendous and detailed knowledge of how Los Angeles DUI cases are fought. He also boasts an impressive academic pedigree (Harvard Law School).

October 27, 2009

Terminator Star Taken to Task for Southern California DUI; Bicyclist Injured

by Michael Kraut

Thomas Dekker — the star of the short-lived TV series: “Terminator: the Sarah Connor Chronicles,” was arrested on Wednesday for driving under the influence in Los Angeles. According to a report from the celebrity blog TMZ.com, the 21-year-old actor slammed into a bicyclist and was booked on charges of felony DUI in Southern California. The accident took place at around 9 PM in the San Fernando Valley. Dekker’s being held on a bail of $100,000.

It’s unclear from reports how serious the bicyclist’s injuries are; nor is it clear whether Dekker himself suffered injuries or whether any property was damaged.

Given the serious consequences associated with a conviction for felony DUI, Dekker will likely require the services of a qualified and experienced Los Angeles DUI attorney.

California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (a) mandates that, in the event that a DUI driver causes injury to another person or persons, his charge may be elevated from a misdemeanor to a felony. California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (b) outlines many of the penalties that can result from a felony DUI conviction. These can include fines and court costs, jail time, forced restitution to victims, and loss of other privileges and licenses.

That being said, a felony injury Los Angeles DUI conviction is by no means guaranteed. The prosecution must meet a heavy burden of proof. First of all, the prosecution must show that the defendant had been driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or greater. Second, the prosecution must show that the defendant had committed some act of negligence or traffic violation that caused the accident that resulted in the injury.

To illustrate this point, let’s consider a scenario in which a driver is DUI. But then a bicyclist blows through a stop sign and drives right in front of his car. The cyclist gets hit and injured. In this case, the driver can be convicted of a misdemeanor DUI, since he was under the influence. But he shouldn’t be convicted of a felony injury DUI, since he had been obeying the traffic laws; the bicyclist provoked the accident by driving negligently.

As you can see, DUI legal issues can come become incredibly complicated. To make sense of your rights and obligations, you need to analyze and investigate. That’s why many defendants trust attorney Michael Kraut to provide savvy guidance. Prior to representing criminal defendants, Attorney Kraut spent years prosecuting Los Angeles DUI cases — essentially working for the “other side” — and he leverages his intimate knowledge of the prosecutorial system to deliver superior results time and again.

October 21, 2009

Montana Senator Hit with Felony Charges For Boating Under the Influence — Case May Merit More News Coverage than Even Many Celebrity Southern California DUI Matters

by Michael Kraut

It’s a case that rivals a celebrity Los Angeles DUI escapade — and it took place in Montana, of all places. At the center of the storm is Senator Greg Barkus (R- Montana) who, on the night of August 7th, allegedly drove a boat into a rocky coastline at speeds approaching 45 miles per hour.

Senator Barkus (along with his wife, fellow Congressman Denny Rehberg, and two staffers) were all hurt in the accident. Prosecutors have revealed that Senator Barkus’ blood sample tested at 0.16 percent nearly two hours after the crash occurred. That’s twice Montana’s legal limit for driving (0.08 percent). The senator has been tagged for DUI previously. In 2004, he pled guilty to driving under the influence in the city of Polson, Montana.

If convicted of felony charges against him, the senator could face up to ten years in prison — for each of the three charges — and he could face tens or thousands of dollars worth of fines. He is due to appear in Flathead District Court in Montana on October 22nd for his arraignment.

As a veteran Southern California DUI defense attorney would likely have told the senator, building a rock-ribbed legal defense in a case as complex and public as this requires careful investigation. For instance, a deep analysis might lead the senator to challenge the validity of the results of his blood test. (According to a report in The Billings Gazette, the senator’s passengers did not (at the time) believe him to be intoxicated. Another report revealed that a political rival (a Democrat state representative) ran the lab where the senator’s blood sample was first sent to be analyzed.)

Contrary to many people’s beliefs, blood tests often yield unclear or even biased results. Many factors can cause the test to indicate a higher BAC level than the subject actually might have had. For instance, the chemicals inside the test may have been expired or poorly preserved. The sample may have been misidentified, mishandled, mistested, misinterpreted, or stored improperly. Problems with sterility, refrigeration, and contamination can all influence results.

Of course, given that courts generally consider blood tests to be more reliable than breathalyzer and urine tests, it’s almost always a good idea to retain a top notch Southern California DUI attorney to assist with your case. If you have been arrested and charged with DUI in Los Angeles, connect today with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Attorney Kraut is a Harvard Law School grad and a former LA District Attorney with a tremendous track record. Since he once prosecuted DUI cases for a living, he understands better than most how to shore up potentially shaky defenses and aggressively battle back.