DUI Consequences

June 16, 2010

Former Yankee Busted for Los Angeles DUI

Hideki Irabu, former Major League pitcher for the Yankees, Expos and Rangers, got pulled over for driving under the influence in Los Angeles on May 17th on Redondo Beach Boulevard, according police reports. The 41-year-old Irabu had played for professional teams in Japan before coming to the United States to play in the Majors. Although Yankees fans generally liked Irabu, the pitcher famously publicly clashed with Yankee’s owner, George Steinbrenner.

According to police officers, Irabu was driving on Redondo Beach Boulevard, weaving in and out of lanes. Officers saw him nearly graze a parked car. They pulled him over, booked him around 2 AM, and released him on $5,000 bail the next morning at 10:30. Prosecutors may formally charge the former pitcher shortly.

Irabu is no stranger to scrapes with law enforcement. In August 2008, while visiting Osaka, Japan, he allegedly assaulted a bar manager over a bar tab after downing nearly two dozen glasses of beer.

If, like Irabu, you (or someone you love) face a similar charge of driving under the influence in Long Beach or elsewhere in Los Angeles, you could be facing consequences spelled out by California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) or 23152(b).

23152(a) says that if the police stop you while you are driving a car while DUI (on drugs or alcohol), then you can be charged with a criminal act. A conviction could result in a criminal record, driver’s license suspension, jail time, significant fines, and all sorts of frustrating secondary consequences. For instance, your insurance rates may go through the roof, you may lose your job, and you may face stigma for your criminal record for years to come.

23152(b) makes it a crime to drive with a blood alcohol concentration of greater than 0.08%, and the same consequences stipulated in 23152(a) will await you.

So how can you effectively navigate charges of Long Beach DUI?

You could theoretically represent yourself or leave your case in the hands of a public defender. But consider how much is on the line for you. Jail is no joke, and while the short-term penalties can be excruciating and embarrassing, the long-term consequences can be practically unbearable. Thus, it almost always behooves defendants to connect with a reputable and experienced Los Angeles DUI attorney, who knows the laws as well as the people involved.

June 9, 2010

Los Angeles DUI Arrests Down for Memorial Day Weekend 2010

by Michael Kraut

According to California Highway Patrol reports, police made 231 Los Angeles DUI arrests over Memorial Day weekend (6 p.m. Friday the 28th through Monday the 31st). Unfortunately, although DUIs for the region were down from last year – dropping by over 100 (1,296 for 2010 versus 1,406 from 2009), 10 people died in traffic related accidents over the holiday. For the state, numbers of traffic related deaths increased as well – from 12 deaths in 2009 to 31 deaths this year.

The San Diego Union-Tribune reported last Wednesday that 318 motorists got arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California over the holiday, although no DUI related fatalities were reported. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration supports these anti-Southern California DUI operations through the California Office of Traffic Safety. The Union Tribune reports that similar DUI patrols and sobriety checkpoints will be set up for other summer holidays, such as 4th of July and Labor Day, across the state.

Area residents arrested over the holiday weekend must be wondering what steps to take next.

Here is a brief primer on some laws applicable to Southern California DUI cases.

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) says that if you are stopped for driving under the influence in Hollywood, a police officer can arrest you and take you to jail. If convicted, you could lose your California license, be forced to pay fines and court costs (substantial), and be compelled to serve other punishments, such as jail time, probation, and forced alcohol school.

Another closely related section, California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b), stipulates that if you drive with a blood alcohol concentration of greater than 0.08%, you are automatically above the limit for Beverly Hills DUI, and you could face the same consequences outlined in 23152(a).

Closely related sections of the vehicle code govern consequences for drivers who injure people while driving DUI. CVC Section 23153(a) elevates a misdemeanor Los Angeles DUI charge to a felony if a DUI driver injured someone else. CVC Section 23153(b) likewise elevates a misdemeanor to a felony if you are above 0.08% BAC and you hurt someone else while driving.

So how can you or a loved one defend against these charges?

While you are legally entitled to represent yourself, it generally makes sense to retain an experienced lawyer – not just someone who has done a lot of criminal defense work but someone who has worked specifically on Los Angeles DUI cases.

May 24, 2010

Los Angeles DUI Experts Riveted by Tragic Case of Man Nabbed for Eighth DUI – after Just Getting Out of Jail for Killing Someone While DUI

by Michael Kraut

Bloggers who follow stories about driving under the influence in Southern California were glued to their computers last Monday afternoon following a case out of Franklin County, Vermont involving a man arrested for his eighth lifetime DUI.

The defendant, Douglas Gardner, was last arrested for driving under the influence in 1989, when he crashed head-on into a car and killed 20-year Billy Labier-Boucher. Gardener served a 20-year prison sentence. After securing release last month, Gardner almost immediately got back into trouble. He allegedly stole a Pontiac Aztek, drank two beers and a vodka, and veered off Route 78 in Highgate into a bog. The Vermont troopers who found him tested his blood alcohol content at 0.156% – nearly twice the legal limit for Southern California DUI of 0.08%, as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b).

The state attorney asked for bail to be set at $100,000, but Judge Greg Rainville went one step further and ordered Gardener held without bail. The Judge remarked: “you are a threat to the safety of the public… if I can’t stop you from driving, I can’t allow you on the streets.” The Judge’s ruling elicited enthusiasm from Pat Labier-Boucher, the mother of the man that Gardner killed in 1989. Labier-Boucher said: “it was like 20 years ago… it’s like reliving the whole thing again… I hope he is behind bars forever.”

Obviously, similar cases of manslaughter DUI in Glendale and elsewhere are tragic for many reasons. But what does local law say about Los Angeles DUI manslaughter charges?

According to Penal Code Section 191.5(a), in very serious cases, a defendant can be charged with “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.” Prosecutors don’t necessarily have to go for this charge. But to prove gross vehicular manslaughter, prosecutors must meet a very high burden. First, you must show that the defendant drove under the influence of drugs or alcohol with a BAC of 0.08% or more. Second, you must show that the defendant committed a driving infraction, misdemeanor, or other legal act that could lead to death of another person. Third, you must show that the person committed this act with gross negligence. And fourth, you must show that the grossly negligent act led to the actual death of someone.

May 19, 2010

NCAA Championship Guard Arrested for Driving under the Influence in Southern California…in a Golf Cart!

by Michael Kraut

JJ Hones, a 22-year-old point guard for the NCAA Championship Stanford women’s basketball team, was arrested on May 2nd for DUI in Southern California under very extraordinary circumstances. According to arrest reports, Hones was recklessly driving a golf cart across campus. When police attempted to pull her over, she at first evaded arrest. Police finally caught her and gave her a field sobriety test, which she allegedly failed. They then took her to Santa Clara County Jail.

The senior was kicked off her team the following Monday. Hones had been struggling under multiple knee injuries, but she had intended to play another season prior to her arrest. So far, charges have not been handed down. Fortunately, no one was injured in the incident.

If you get pulled over — whether for recklessly driving a golf cart DUI in Pasadena or for causing an injury DUI in Burbank — chances are that you will be subjected to field sobriety tests (FSTs) similar to the ones that JJ Hones faced. But what are these field sobriety tests? How do they work? What do officers look for? And how do the courts typically interpret their results?

Although officers do have leeway in terms of how they conduct FSTs; typically, they subject suspects of Pasadena DUI to the following:

1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test – The subject is asked to follow a light or object with her eyes. If reaction time of the pupils is sub-par, DUI may be suspected.

2. Walk The Line Test – Suspect is asked to walk nine paces in both directions on a line (typically a road divider line). If the suspect loses her balance or fails to complete the paces, she may be suspected of Los Angeles DUI.

3. Finger to the Nose Test – Suspect is asked to close her eyes and reach her hands out to the sides and then bring them in to touch her nose. If she misses or loses her balance, DUI may be suspected.

4. Stand on One Leg Test – Suspect is asked to stand on one leg for about 90 seconds. If she loses her balance, DUI may be suspected.

Another balance test requires the suspect to tilt her head backwards and count to 30. If she loses her balance, she could be suspected for DUI.

Officers will also observe your behavior. Is there odor of alcohol on you? Are you slurring your words? Is your story coherent? Are you acting belligerent, lethargic or otherwise strangely?

If you fail a sobriety test and get arrested for driving under the influence in Pasadena or elsewhere in Southern California, you may need smart legal representation to protect your rights and ensure that you get fair treatment.

March 29, 2010

Another Sports Arrest – Nope, Not a Los Angeles DUI This Time – This Took Place in Atlanta – But Southern California Sports Watchers Have Nonetheless Been Riveted by it

by Michael Kraut

Los Angeles DUI arrests involving celebrities and sports figures are common news. Just take a quick scan through this blog, and you will come away flabbergasted at how many of our public figures have gotten in trouble for driving under the influence in Southern California.

Today’s entry concerns a DUI out of Atlanta, however, involving Miami Dolphins runningback Ronnie Brown. Last Friday night, Brown was pulled over for an improper lane change (he allegedly didn’t signal), and the officer gave him a field sobriety test. He did not perform well on this test, so the officer took him into custody and booked him for DUI in Atlanta. After his release Saturday morning, Brown quickly hired an attorney. The Miami Dolphins as well as Brown’s agent have kept relatively quiet about the incident, although his allies have pointed out that he has never been in any kind of legal trouble before. The 28-year old Pro Bowl runningback was a second pick in the 2005 NFL draft, and he is scheduled to continue to attend the Dolphin’s voluntary training camp.

What happens when someone is pulled over for the first time for DUI in Pasadena, Glendale – or anywhere else in Southern California, for that matter?

If you are convicted of a misdemeanor, your life could instantly change. First of all, your California drivers’ license could be suspended for an entire year, and you may not get a restricted license to drive for work or school.

Second, you may be required to install what’s known as an Interlock Ignition Device (IID) in your vehicle. This is a breathalyzer-like instrument that you must blow into before you can start your car. It takes a reading of your blood alcohol concentration based on your breath, and if you even have the slightest hint of alcohol, your engine won’t start.

Third of all, you will have to pay court costs and fines up to $1,000.

Fourth, you could face limits on your release, including probation, mandatory alcohol school, and other stipulations.

Fifth, you will have to do time in jail – a minimum of 48 hours.

Of course, if you are driving under the influence in Glendale and injure somebody, you could be convicted for a felony, and the punishments could be significantly harsher.

What can you do to respond effectively and efficiently to charges of driving under the influence in Southern California?

Your best bet is almost always to consult with a reputable, vetted, highly credentialed attorney.

February 17, 2010

Double Trouble: Twin felony Los Angeles DUI charges handed out after two DUI drivers crash into each other

by Michael Kraut

On January 23rd, two individuals both driving under the influence of alcohol in Burbank collided into one another, causing minor injuries and damage. According to investigating officer, James Laforce, here is what happened:

A car traveling eastbound on Sherman Way attempted a U-turn, when an oncoming truck plowed into it, knocking the car onto a nearby curb. The truck, meanwhile, slammed into a Ford Mustang parked nearby. The truck driver — along with his passenger — fled the scene, but both men were apprehended and arrested shortly thereafter for trying to break into someone’s residence.

The truck driver got tagged for a felony hit and run charge; he is currently being investigated for a misdemeanor DUI charge. Meanwhile, the 20-something-year-old woman who had been driving the car got taken to hospital for minor injuries. Reports suggest that neither her, nor her passengers, suffered any life-threatening injuries. Nevertheless, the woman was hit with a felony Los Angeles DUI charge.

Laforce had this to say about the accident: “it was ugly… they are lucky they are alive.”

In this Burbank DUI instance, fortunately no one got seriously injured or killed. But what happens if someone dies in a Southern California DUI crash? What kinds of charges might a driver face?

The answer, obviously, depends on the circumstances of the accident. California Penal Code Section 191.5(a) describes the charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. To prove this kind of charge, prosecutors must show four key things:
1) The person drove a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08% or higher; or otherwise clearly drove under the influence of a drug;
2) The person committed a driving infraction or unlawful act — such as a misdemeanor — that could potentially cause someone to die;
3) The driver not only committed this unlawful act or infraction, but he or she did so with gross negligence;
4) This gross negligence led to someone’s death.

DUI murder charges (a.k.a. Watson murders) carry even stiffer penalties and harsher jail sentences than do charges of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

Whether you’re facing a (relatively) minor misdemeanor Burbank DUI charge, or you’ve been arrested for gross vehicular manslaughter while under the influence, you are entitled to a sound and competent defense. Given how much is at stake, it makes sense to invest in high quality legal representation.

February 10, 2010

Mel Gibson’s 2006 Los Angeles DUI Back in the News after Gibson Curses TV Reporter

by Michael Kraut

Mel Gibson’s 2006 Los Angeles DUI arrest may have been the most written-about celebrity DUI arrests of the past decade. That’s saying a lot, given the wall-to-wall coverage that celebrity DUIs merit (see, for example, the DUIs for Lindsay Lohan, Nick Nolte, Stephanie Pratt, etc.).

Gibson’s arrest on Pacific Coast Highway on July 28, 2006 was relatively “ordinary” as far as Beverly Hills DUI arrests go. He was driving more than 40 miles over the speed limit with a BAC that later tested at 0.12% (California’s legal limit is 0.08%), when he was pulled over and arrested by Malibu police deputy James Mee. Gibson allegedly launched into an anti-Semitic rant, behavior that he later admitted was “despicable.”

Gibson and his publicists worked hard to put that memorable Southern California DUI arrest in the past. But old wounds opened on Wednesday February 3rd when the actor lashed out against Chicago television reporter Dean Richards (WGN TV), after Richards brought up the DUI during a TV interview about Gibson’s latest film, Edge of Darkness. Richards asked the actor about his “drinking problems” and “the anti Semitic rant.” Gibson shot back “that was almost four years ago, dude. I’ve moved on. I guess you haven’t.” Then, Gibson called the reporter an a****** — apparently unaware that the cameras were still rolling. (Gibson and his publicists have since done another round of damage control to keep this latest bit of hostility under wraps.)

Any mention of Gibson’s arrest would be incomplete without a brief discussion of the penalties typically doled out for misdemeanor Southern California DUI. Even if it’s only your first time pulled over for driving under the influence, you can still be subject to any one (and possibly even all) of the following punishments:

• Six weeks of DUI alcohol school (maximum nine months)
• Strict terms of probation for release. You may have to check in with a California probation officer periodically and adhere to other conditions and terms to get released.
• One year suspension of California drivers’ license — no restricted license allowed
• A $1,000 fine
• Court costs (which can be significantly more than $1,000)
• Mandatory jail time of two full days in custody (48 hours); maximum half a year in jail
• Mandatory installation of interlock ignition device (IID) in your vehicle. (For instance, had Gibson been arrested for a Southern California DUI today instead of in 2006, he would have been compelled by law to install an IID in his 2006 Lexus LS 430.)

How can you effectively construct a defense so you won’t have to endure these (many) penalties for driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in Los Angeles?

Lawyers abound in Southern California who can nominally do this kind of defense work. But unless you’re very careful about choosing, you can easily get second class representation, which could indirectly mean more stringent punishments and a longer, more costly road to rehabilitation. Fortunately, you have options…

February 2, 2010

Southern California DUI Community Notes Bengals Linebacker’s DUI Troubles

by Michael Kraut

On Friday, Southern California DUI blogs buzzed with the news that homegrown sports hero, Ray Maualuga, had been arrested for DUI in Covington Kentucky. The 23-year-old Maualuga — who was drafted by the Bengals in 2009 out of the University of Southern California — reportedly had been driving with a BAC of .157 when his 2003 Pontiac spun out of control and smashed into a parking meter and two cars. No one was injured. But Maualuga did cause minor but significant property damage. The Bengal’s linebacker tested at nearly twice the Kentucky (and California) legal limit of 0.08%. He is scheduled to return next month to Kenton County District Court for a hearing on the matter. In addition to the gamut of potential court imposed penalties, Maualuga faces the possibility of being disciplined by the NFL for violating the league’s personal conduct policy.

This morning, Maualuga Tweeted to his Twitter followers about his remorse over what happened. He vowed to “do everything in my power to gain ur trust back! I will definitely learn from this!”

Whether you’re pulled over for DUI in Covington, Kentucky or DUI in Pasadena, California, the consequences of conviction can be life changing. Here in Southern California, the basic relevant laws are encapsulated in two sections of the California Vehicle Code: sections 23152 (a) and (b). The first section stipulates that a driver pulled over by the police while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be placed under arrest and charged with a misdemeanor or felony. If the Court convicts, he or she will face punishments like jail time, license suspension, points on the license, and fines and court costs. As of January 1, 2010, even a first-time Pasadena DUI offender will be required to install something called an interlock ignition device (IID) in his or her vehicle. This mechanism prevents a driver from starting the engine unless he or she blows into a Breathalyzer like device first.

Section 23152 (b) stipulates that a driver who operates a vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of greater than 0.08% can be arrested for DUI. Officers use a number of tests to determine this BAC number — including urine analysis, breathalyzers, and blood tests. Each of these common methods has pluses and minuses.

If you’re arrested for a Pasadena DUI, it can help to discuss your matter with a qualified and proven lawyer. After all, perhaps your BAC test was biased, inaccurate, or improperly interpreted. The only way to build a superior defense is to analyze all relevant facts in context. Most Pasadena DUI attorneys spend their entire careers only arguing for defendants. As a result, they may be blinded to certain solutions.

January 27, 2010

Sentencing Issued in Southern California DUI Manslaughter Case

by Michael Kraut

Last Friday, Corporal Elijah Fergusson (22) was sentenced for Southern California DUI manslaughter for a February 22nd, 2008 car accident that resulted in the death of an area doctor, Dr. Michael Sein.
On the night of the accident, Fergusson, a young marine who had just returned from a tour of duty in Iraq, had been playing drinking games on his marine base. His friends hid his car keys. But then Fergusson got into a phone altercation with his wife, who threatened to leave him. Determined to see her and his young child, the marine allegedly bullied his subordinates into letting him drive a Dodge Cavalier. But he got lost on the way to his house and ended up on McArthur Boulevard, where he slammed into the back of Seins’ vehicle at 74 mph.

Fergusson’s attorneys had argued that the marine got PTSD on his tour of duty in Iraq and that therefore he should be let off with a more lenient sentence. In the end, Judge Ronald Bauer of Superior Court agreed with the Deputy District Attorney’s recommendation of 15 years to life for the DUI manslaughter. (The family of the victim had asked for a 21 year to life term.)

The distinction between Southern California DUI vehicular manslaughter and DUI murder can be subtle. Most non experts assume that charges of vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and DUI murder are interchangeable. But in fact they are extremely different. They carry different penalties and require different burdens of proof.

In California, a vehicular manslaughter charge can be filed if a driver causes a traffic accident due to negligence, gross negligence, or the commission of a traffic infraction. Whether or not you were under the influence when the accident happened is immaterial for this charge.

The charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is far more serious — pursuant to penal code section 191.5(a), the prosecution must prove four points in order for this charge to stick:

1) The suspect was driving under the influence in Southern California with a BAC level of 0.08 percent or more.
2) The driver committed an infraction, misdemeanor, or other act that could lead to death.
3) The infraction, unlawful act or misdemeanor could lead to someone’s death “with gross negligence.”
4) The grossly negligent actions of the driver were the cause of the death of somebody.

DUI murder charges are even more serious. These charges are often called “Watson murders.” If convicted, an individual can face 15 + years to life in jail. Watson murder charges are typically only brought in extreme cases. For instance, if the suspect has numerous DUI convictions and then gets behind the wheel while under the influence and kills someone, he or she might be subjected to a Watson murder charge.

If you or someone you know or love has been charged with vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, or DUI murder in Southern California, you likely need a solid, well versed attorney to represent you.

January 25, 2010

Former Hollywood DUI Defendant to Appear on Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew

by Michael Kraut

Musician Mike Starr — best known as the bass player for the ‘90s rock band Alice in Chains — and former Hollywood DUI defendant — is scheduled to appear on the second episode of VH1’s Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew. The reality series follows the journeys of eight different celebrities who are in treatment for drug and alcohol addiction recovery. This year’s series will follow the stories of (among others) tattooed basketball legend Dennis Rodman, Heidi Fleiss (the famed former Madame of Hollywood), and Kari Ann Peniche, a Miss United States Teen pageant winner.

Starr, 43, has been arrested multiple times for drug and alcohol violations in cities as far flung as Salt Lake City, L.A., Seattle, and Pasadena. In 1994, he was booked at a Houston airport for possession of narcotics. In September 28, 2008, he was pulled over for drug possession in Los Angeles. In 2005, Starr was arrested in Seattle for yanking the hood ornament off of a man’s car.

If you’re caught driving under the influence in Pasadena, what exactly happens to you? How do the police know whether or not you’re over the legal limit?

One method the police use to determine your blood alcohol content (BAC) level is the blood test. Whether you’re arrested for DUI in Pasadena, DUI in Hollywood, or DUI anywhere else in Southern California, the blood test must be administered in a very precise manner. First, a sample is taken from the vein of the suspect. Then a qualified technician must ID it and transport it for further testing. The results must then be reported and interpreted. The blood sample is mixed with certain chemicals to prevent clotting, and police can choose from one of three acceptable methods to test BAC concentration.

Are blood tests always right?

Like breathalyzer tests, blood tests can yield what are known as false positives — that is, they can give a reading above the CA legal limit of 0.08% even if a suspect was actually BELOW that number.

Unfortunately, many Pasadena DUI suspects do not realize how fallible these tests can be. At any number of nodes in the process, problems can occur that can skew results and lead to false positives. For instance:
• sample is not kept sterile;
• the preservative chemical mixture is improperly mixed;
• the sample is not refrigerated correctly or kept at the right temperature;
• the person who takes the blood sample does not have proper training or licensing;
• the alcohol used on the skin to sterilize contaminates the sample;
• the police mix up samples or improperly interpret results
So how can you prevent a false positive from getting you convicted of DUI in Pasadena? Your best bet is almost always to solicit the services of a trial-proven attorney who specializes in DUI defense.