DUI Crime and Punishment

August 16, 2010

Southern California DUI Experts React to Guilty Plea in Prominent New York DWI Death Case

Experts in Southern California DUI law try to pay attention to events that occur on the national radar as well as to local Southland news items. And a recent development in a heartbreaking case out of New York City has once again stoked debate and discussion among the community.

Below is the scoop.

Carmen Huertas was partying last October in Chelsea when she decided to load up her van with seven young girls and take them to the Bronx for a slumber party at her house. Unfortunately, Huertas had been drinking. Allegedly, she knew it too. According to testimony, she told her passengers “if you think I am going to crash, raise your hand!” Anyway, Huertas got onto the Henry Hudson Parkway and lost of her car control around West 96 Street. In the terrible crash that ensued, 11-year-old Leandra Rosado died.

Now, Huertas is prepared to enter a plea of guilty to the manslaughter charge against her in hopes that Justice Charles Solomon will be lenient. Justice Solomon has said in the past that he would give her something in between the maximum possible sentence of 15 years and minimum possible sentence of 1 year.

What happens if someone commits vehicular manslaughter while DUI in Glendale (or elsewhere in the Los Angeles area)? There are actually laws on the books that specifically handle Los Angeles DUI vehicular manslaughter. This occurs when a motor vehicle driver violates traffic laws or is careless or negligent — and as a result of this carelessness or fault indirectly or directly causes the death of another human being.

There are degrees of vehicular manslaughter. One of the strongest charges is “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.” To prove this, the prosecutor must show that the defendant was more than just normally “negligent” – he or she had to have been “grossly negligent.” If you are convicted of this more serious charge, you can face 10 plus years in jail or longer for every person who died in the accident. Gross negligence is defined as recklessness that creates serious bodily injury and/or death. And a reasonable person would know that the behavior would create this kind of extreme risk.

Whether you have been charged with a very serious crime, such as gross vehicular manslaughter while DUI in Pasadena, or you have been pulled over for a more “run of the mill” (but obviously very sobering and scary) charge of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills with a BAC of 0.14%, you likely need comprehensive and strategic guidance with your legal defense.

When defendants research Los Angeles DUI attorneys, they typically feel significant pressure to make a choice quickly. But it’s important to find an attorney who has the experience, track record and capacity to deliver a superior defense for you.

August 11, 2010

Los Angeles DUI Experts Closely Watch Virginia Case; Man Accused of Killing Nun May Face Murder Charges

by Michael Kraut

Southern California DUI experts are monitoring a breaking case out of Virginia involving a recidivist DUI driver who allegedly slammed into a car full of nuns, hurting two of them and killing one of the sisters. This epic tragedy made national headlines and sparked debate among the legal community – particularly since the county prosecutor plans to seek a DUI murder charge against the suspect, 23 year old Carlos Montano.

Prior to this incident, Montano had been twice convicted for DUI, and his license had been revoked for DUI reasons. So he never should have gotten behind the wheel in the first place. Allegedly, he was driving southbound on the highway, when he veered out of his lane, smashed into a barrier, and crossed over to the northbound side, where he hit a car carrying the nuns head on. 66-year old Sister Janet Mosier died on the scene, while sisters Charlotte Lange and Connie Lupton suffered critical injuries and got med-evaced to nearby Fairfax Hospital.

Montano was arrested and charged with involuntary manslaughter as well as driving under a revoked license. Apparently, Montano was also in the United States illegally, and Paul Ebert announced last Tuesday that he plans to charge the man with DUI murder.

Obviously, this situation is a terrible tragedy, and it drives home the point that anyone who drives under the influence in Long Beach or anywhere else in Southern California risks hurting or even killing other people and suffering grievous consequences themselves.

A DUI murder charge – also known as a Watson murder – is a second degree murder charge. It can result in penalties of 15 years in prison up to life in prison. Watson murder cases are very rarely charged – in most instances of Southern California DUI related homicide, prosecutors will seek something like “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated” pursuant to Penal Code Section 191.5 (a) – itself a very serious charge but not as serious as a Watson murder charge. In Southern California, to prove a Watson murder case, a prosecutor usually has to show that the defendant has multiple prior Los Angeles DUI convictions and that the person drove with “implied malice” – in other words, he or she had a clear understanding of the dangers but chose to ignore them. And by choosing to ignore them and by driving under the influence in Long Beach (or wherever), he or she caused the death of another human being.

Of course, even if you face a relatively “pedestrian” charge of driving over the California legal limit of 0.08% in Long Beach, you could face tremendous problems, such as a revoked CA drivers’ license, mandatory interlock ignition device installation, jail time, and steep fines.

You want a creditable, successful attorney to suggest solutions.

August 9, 2010

Southern California DUI Rampage Leaves Several Injured; San Francisco Giants Outfielder’s Brother Named as Culprit

by Michael Kraut

Last Sunday, residents of the sleepy town of Danville witnessed a shocking multiple hit and run Southern California DUI rampage involving Cainan Schierholtz, the brother of Nate Schierholtz, an outfielder for the San Francisco Giants. All told, the 23-year old Schierholtz allegedly hit a bicyclist, a pedestrian, and several cars and trucks before he was stopped.

Diagram of a Rampage
The insanity began around 10 in the morning on Sunday, when police officers heard a report that someone was driving DUI near Railroad Avenue and Danville Boulevard. Schierholtz by that time had probably already hit his first victim – a bicyclist on Danville Blvd. Rather than stop to help the bicyclist, Schierholtz continued forward and rammed into a pedestrian. Again, he did not stop and instead swerved into another lane and slammed into a pickup truck. Again, he didn’t stop. He pulled onto Linda Mesa Avenue and smashed into a Lexus SUV. Meanwhile, the driver of the pickup followed him onto Montair Drive.

The suspect was cornered on that dead end street and blocked by the pickup truck. He was at that point driving with his airbags deployed (but still managing somehow to move forward). But because the pickup truck blocked him, he got stuck. The pickup truck driver and local neighbors surrounded and subdued him before police got to the scene and arrested him.

Schierholtz was held on $350,000 bail and charged with multiple counts of Southern California DUI causing injury, three counts of injury hit and run, and two counts of property damage. And to top it off, the 23 year old was charged with driving without a license.

Fortunately, no one appears to have been severely injured during the rampage. But Schierholtz faces a huge legal battle. According to California Vehicle Code Sections 23153 (a) and 23153 (b), a typical count of Los Angeles DUI can be elevated to a felony if a driver under the influence causes injury to another person. Felony charges are more serious than misdemeanors. If you are convicted of a felony, for instance, you will lose your right to vote, and you may find it very difficult to get loans, find employment, and qualify for a lease on a car or an apartment.

If you are arrested for a DUI in Glendale or DUI in Pasadena and charged with injuring someone while under the influence, you will need to put together a strategically engineered defense. Depending on the circumstances, you could try to get the charges dropped altogether. In other cases, you may seek to plea bargain down the charges. For instance, in exchange for prosecutors not charging you with injury DUI in Pasadena, you might accept a lesser charge of a simple Los Angeles DUI, pursuant to California Vehicle Code Sections 23152 (a) or 23152(b).

In any event, chances are that you need a time tested attorney on your side to advise you and suggest a strategic way forward.

August 4, 2010

A Lesson for All Would-Be Southern California DUI Drivers: From a 13-Year-Old Girl

by Michael Kraut

No one disputes that driving DUI in Los Angeles is dangerous – and that conscientious people should do everything in their power to prevent friends and relatives under the influence from getting behind the wheel. But a rare story out of Islip, New York drives home this point in emotionally compelling fashion. The story involves a 13-year-old girl who called 911 after her mom insisted on driving DUI in spite of having her and her 10-year-old brother as passengers.

CNN reported that the 13-year-old daughter of Jamie Hicks called 911 last Sunday, while her mom was weaving on I-84 near Connecticut. The New York State Police pulled Ms. Hicks over and arrested her after she failed a field sobriety test. Her BAC level tested at 0.18% – more than twice the legal limit for Southern California DUI. According to CNN, Ms. Hicks will appear in court on August 17th to face an array of charges, including charges of endangering minors.

It obviously took guts for the young woman to call the police — she clearly did not want to see her mother put behind bars — but perhaps her act averted disaster.

Moving to another important general lesson, let’s talk again about Southern California Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) – what they are, how they have bearing (or not) on cases, and what you should do if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence in Pasadena — hopefully not with young children in your car.

Field Sobriety Tests are mental and physical exams given by police officers. A common mental test involves saying the alphabet backwards. Physical exams include the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, which is essentially a pupil reaction time test. DUI individuals tend to have slower reaction times. Balancing tests include: walk the line, one leg stand, finger to the nose and rhomberg (where you tilt your head backwards and count from 1 to 30).

In theory, Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) should do a pretty good job determining who is DUI in Pasadena and who is not. But in practice, the tests can be extremely problematic. First of all, drivers pulled over under suspicion of DUI tend to be nervous, jittery, uncomfortable, nauseous, and otherwise out of sorts. Their behavior (e.g. stumbling and fumbling) may have nothing to do with whether or not they are under the influence and everything to do with their natural disposition or their feelings of fear. Also, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has suggested that all but three of the FSTs that police officers typically use – the horizontal gaze nystagmus, one leg stand, and walk and turn tests – really don’t show a correlation between impairment due to alcohol and performance.

For example, someone who is DUI may have a fantastic memory and may be able recite the alphabet backwards by rote even with a BAC of 0.20.

If you have been pulled over for Southern California DUI, you likely need a smart and experienced attorney in your corner to investigate the arrest and help you come up with a strategy to deal with the charges. Sometimes that strategy may involve trying to get the charges excused completely. Other times, it might involve trying to plea bargain down the charges so you will face a lesser offense and reduced punishment.

August 2, 2010

Even Los Angeles DUI Veterans Stunned by Man’s 17th DUI Arrest

by Michael Kraut

You might think that Southern California DUI experts have seen at all – from celebrity arrests (e.g. Nick Nolte, Lindsay Lohan, Mel Gibson) to other bizarre stories we have covered here on this blog. But a breaking story out of Louisiana actually may take the cake for most jaw-dropping case of the year.

The Sun Herald reports that Jimmy Graves Jr. was sentenced last Wednesday to 5 years in jail pursuant to his 17th DUI arrest. The 40-year-old Gonzales got pulled over last May 11th with a BAC of 0.16% – exactly twice the legal limit of a Long Beach DUI. Initially, prosecutors charged Graves with a misdemeanor second DUI offense. But upon further consideration, prosecutors found that Graves had been pulled over for DUI 16 prior times (including both convictions and arrests) and sought to punish him more. The jury sided with the prosecutors and sentenced Graves to a day-for-day five-year prison sentence — without consideration for early release — due to his habitual offender status. Graves’ Long Beach DUI arrest (Long Beach, Louisiana that is) occurred at 12:30 A.M. while he was driving his wife to the beach for his birthday. He maintained up until the end that he was not guilty of the charge and that the breathalyzer Intoxilyzer 8000 had malfunctioned.

Now, in the case of a guy who had 16 prior DUI arrests, one might be very dubious of this defense. After all, fool me once, shame on you… fool me 16 times, shame on me.

However – although this blog obviously can’t say anything about this particular case – breathalyzer machines are far more fallible than most people (including most police officers and Los Angeles DUI defendants) realize. Breathalyzers fail to distinguish between men and women, who process alcohol at different rates. Breathalyzers have a hard time telling the difference between ethanol and other chemicals on the breath – particularly chemicals found in the breath of diabetics. The amount of food, the depth of the breath blown, the calibration of the machine, officer bias, and literally dozens of other factors can prejudice results, yielding false positives.

A savvy Long Beach DUI attorney can challenge your breathalyzer-related arrest. The key is retaining a Los Angeles DUI lawyer who has the knowhow, knowledge, and track record to get the job done.

July 19, 2010

Lindsay Lohan gets Jail Time for Violating Los Angeles DUI Probation Terms

by Michael Kraut

When the flurry of news about Lindsay Lohan’s 90-day jail sentence for violating her Los Angeles DUI probation hit the fan a few weeks ago, this blog deliberately avoided covering it because there was simply too much sensationalism about it in the press. However, given the layers and twists and turns that the story has been taking, any blog devoted to covering news related to driving under the influence in Southern California would be remiss if it did not address the latest developments in the case.

Last week, Lohan hired Robert Shapiro, the criminal defense attorney who once represented O.J. Simpson. She also checked into a rehab facility that the famous lawyer set up. Lohan faced flack (and some praise) from fans and celebrity gossipmongers for her covert communications (via drawing on her hands) and general histrionics.

Obviously, without knowledge of the details of her Southern California DUI case, it is not fair to weigh in one way or another. That’s a key point. You really have to be careful about what you read in the media, as news stories automatically tend to oversimplify and skew coverage. Although the American legal system operates on the principle of “innocent until proven guilty,” often, the public press works on just the opposite principle – guilty until proven innocent.

All this is to say that, if you or a loved one faces a similar battle against a charge of Hollywood DUI, you want facts and strategic guidance – not opinions and theories based on hearsay.

For instance, how well do you know the penalties for Southern California DUI? As you may have read, Lohan got approximately three months in jail for violating the terms of her probation. But what exactly does that mean? What do convicted DUI offenders typically face, punishment-wise? Does the court have leeway? Can your lawyer help reduce your sentence? And what happens if you collect more than one DUI? These are all critical questions – and the answers can be dynamic. That’s why having a Hollywood DUI attorney provide good strategic guidance can be crucial. That said, let’s just review again some basic parameters.

First timers could get the following penalties: 48 hours in jail (max six months), $1,000 in fines and court costs, California driver’s license suspension of a year, mandatory six weeks or more DUI alcohol school, formal probation imposed, and a mandatory interlock ignition device installation (as of July 1, 2010).

Second time convicts (within 10 years) face jacked up penalties, such as at least four days in jail instead of 48 hours, a minimum of 18 months in DUI alcohol school as opposed to six weeks, a two-year driver’s license suspension as opposed to one year, increases in court costs and fines, and likely stricter terms of probation.

And as you get more and more DUIs within a 10-year period, your penalties increase incrementally. Under some circumstances – for instance, if you cause an injury to someone while DUI in Hollywood – your charge could be elevated from a misdemeanor to a felony.

The point is, whether you are a high profile defendant on the order of Ms. Lohan or whether you face a “workaday” Los Angeles DUI charge, you really need expert guidance to try to minimize your sentence and maximize your chances for a healthy and safe recovery.

July 14, 2010

Southern California DUI Blogs Buzz about Seahawks Runningback’s Arrest

by Michael Kraut

Southern California DUI reporters have been furiously blogging the past week about the arrest last Saturday of Quinton Ganther, a runningback for Seattle Seahawks. The 25-year-old Ganther played for the Washington Redskins last season and rushed for more than 200 yards. The Seahawks signed him to compete to play on the 53-man squad as a reserve runningback.

According to the Seattle Times, Ganther was driving around 3:45 early Saturday morning near Sacramento when the California Highway Patrol (CHP) pulled him over and took him into custody. After a stay at the Sacramento County Jail, Ganther secured release by making a bail of nearly $1,500. Ganther’s Southern California DUI arrest is just the latest in a series of legal problems for Seahawks players. Leroy Hill, a teammate, was busted in April for charges of domestic violence and assault – he could be going to trial potentially this month. And Kevin Ellison, a safety, got arrested in May for possessing Vicodin tablets that he didn’t have a prescription for. (Technically, Ellison was on the roster of the San Diego Chargers during that arrest. Subsequently, the Chargers waived his contract, allowing him to sign with the Seahawks.)

Whether you get pulled over for DUI in Long Beach, Laguna Beach, or Sacramento, police officers will (or at least should) subject you to similar treatment. In particular, they will look for so-called “symptoms” of Southern California DUI. Here is a partial list:

• Impaired motor skills
• Odor of alcohol or other intoxicants on the breath
• Eyes are watery and bloodshot
• Incoherent responses to police questions
• Problems fishing out a wallet or driver’s license
• General stumbling and fumbling
• Disheveled appearance
• Demeanor that’s out of the ordinary – e.g. excitable, overly defensive, belligerent
• Incoherent explanation of where the person has been
• Admission to using alcohol, prescription medications, narcotics, or other substances.

If convicted of a charge of Long Beach DUI (or really, DUI anywhere in the Golden State), you can face a variety of scary penalties, including jail time, harsh fines, driver’s license suspension, mandatory alcohol school and probation. And that’s all for a Los Angeles DUI conviction that’s not further complicated by injury or serious property damage.

How much trouble are you in? And what can you do about your arrest?

July 5, 2010

Southern California DUI Blogs Light Up as Mötley Crüe Singer Busted for DUI in Vegas

by Michael Kraut

49-year-old Vince Neil, the lead singer for 80’s hair band Mötley Crüe, was detained last Monday in Las Vegas, after cops pulled him over for driving under the influence in a Ferrari on Las Vegas strip. Southern California DUI experts have been quick to point out that the singer has had multiple encounters with the law over drug and alcohol charges. In 1984, the singer pled guilty in a DUI vehicular manslaughter case, in which he accidently killed Nicholas Dingley, the drummer of Hanoi Rocks. For that crime, he paid out $2.5 million in restitution costs and spent 20 days in jail. Neil was also arrested in 2007 for reckless driving in a Lamborghini in Vegas. During his latest offence, reports TMZ, he was held at Clark County Detention Center prior to being released after posting a $2,000 bail.

If, like Neil, you drive DUI and cause someone’s death directly or indirectly– whether you drive DUI in Burbank on the 101 or DUI in Long Beach on the 405 – you could face severe punishment under California’s vehicular manslaughter laws. Prosecutors will look to police reports and the reports of investigators to determine whether to file vehicular manslaughter charges. One of the most serious offences is “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated” – this is a violation of the Judicial Council of California’s Penal Code section 191.5 (a). The conviction carries monumental penalties, including lots of jail time.

To prove that a person who was DUI in Burbank and killed someone violated Penal Code section 191.5 (a), prosecutors must prove four points:

1. The person drove under the influence of a drug, narcotic, or alcoholic beverage, or had a BAC level of 0.08% or greater.

2. While DUI or otherwise under the influence, the driver committed a driving infraction, misdemeanor or other act that could result in someone else’s death.

3. The driver committed that act, misdemeanor, or infraction with “gross negligence” – an extra degree of recklessness or carelessness.

4. Prosecutors must show that the grossly negligent behavior led – either directly or indirectly – to the actual death of another human being.

As you can see, charges of Southern California DUI can get quite complicated, and a defense can become quite convoluted, particularly if you cause injury to another person like Neil did in 1984.

To that end, to protect your rights, consider retaining experienced Los Angeles DUI defense counsel.

June 28, 2010

Nicole Richie’s Los Angeles DUI Probation Extended

by Michael Kraut

Last Tuesday, a judge extended celebutante Nicole Richie’s Los Angeles DUI probation until March 2011 to give her a chance to finish up her alcohol education courses. Richie – a former reality TV star (The Simple Life) and daughter of pop icon Lionel Richie – was pulled over for driving under the influence in Burbank in December 2006, after she piloted her black Mercedes the wrong way down the freeway. California Highway Patrol (CHP) officers pulled her over and gave her Field Sobriety Tests, which she failed. She later on pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge.

The 28-year-old failed to complete her Los Angeles DUI alcohol school according to schedule, and that’s why the judge ordered her probation extended. Theoretically, if Richie finishes her courses by March 2011, she will be dispatched of her legal obligations pursuant to this incident. She did not appear in court when the judge gave the order, because she was busy attending to her second child, who was born last September. (Richie is engaged to Joel Madden, the lead singer of the band Good Charlotte, and they have two children with each other.)

When the CHP pulled Richie over in 2006 for driving under the influence in Burbank, they gave her standard Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs). Clearly, they had a reason to suspect that something was amiss, since she had been driving the wrong way on the highway. But what kinds of tests did they do, exactly?

June 23, 2010

Painter Thomas Kinkade Stopped for Southern California DUI

by Michael Kraut

Thomas Kinkade, a bestselling painter known for his gausy landscapes and overtly religious themes, was arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California on June 11 in Carmel. According to arrest reports, police pulled over the 52-year-old after they noticed that his 2006 Mercedes lacked a front license plate. An officer smelled alcohol on Kinkade’s breath and called in the CHP to conduct a field sobriety test. Kinkade allegedly failed these tests, and the police booked him into Monterey County jail.

Kinkade’s business dealings had already been under a cloud as result of ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. One of his two companies – Pacific Metro – filed bankruptcy less than two weeks before his Southern California DUI arrest. Kinkade is a self-made artist – he started selling his paintings in the parking lots of supermarkets. Today, he controls a not-unsubstantial artistic empire – or at least he did before his Morgan Hill Production company filed for Chapter 11.

When someone like Kinkade gets pulled over for driving under the influence in Pasadena, what kinds of Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) will he or she be subjected to? Here is a brief guide:

1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test

This is an eye examination — a test for pupil reaction response. A slow response could indicate a Pasadena DUI.

2. Walk the Line

A suspect is asked to take several paces across a line (often a road divider). This is a balance test. If the driver cannot stay on the line, DUI may be suspected.

3. One Leg Stand Test

Another balance test. Suspect has to balance on one foot for a duration. Obviously, stumbling or falling might indicate DUI.

4. Rhomberg Test

Yet another balance test. The suspect must tilt his or her head backwards and count for a duration. Again: stumbling, tipping, or a loss of balance might indicate DUI.

5. Finger-To-The-Nose Test

Suspect must stretch her arms and attempt to touch her fingers to her nose with her eyes closed. If she misses her nose, DUI can be suspected.

Officers can also request a suspect to recite the alphabet in reverse or pass other tests of mental coordination. Failures, incoherent responses, and non-cooperation may all be construed to indicate potential intoxication.

Have you or a loved one has been pulled over for driving under the influence in Pasadena or elsewhere in Southern California?