DUI on Prescription Drugs

January 19, 2010

School Bus Driver Slammed With Charges of Driving Under the Influence While Transporting 15 Children — Possible Implications for Los Angeles DUI Violators?

Recent changes to Southern California DUI laws — mandating that first-time offenders install interlock ignition devices (IIDs) in their vehicles — have made Southland residents more keenly aware of the consequences of driving under the influence.

A breaking story out of Pittsburgh reinforces this message: According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 38-year-old school bus driver, Brian Dunlap, was arrested on Monday for multiple charges, including reckless endangerment, DUI, and endangering the welfare of 15 children from a Pittsburgh high school.

While driving students to a local science museum, Dunlap allegedly narrowly missed hitting a telephone pole; following the scary swerve, he began laughing. Chaperones observed that his eyes were bloodshot and his speech was slurred. Hours later, while leaving the science center (children in tow), Dunlap careered through a red light. Concerned chaperones phoned police, who quickly arrived at the scene, gave the driver a field sobriety test, and remanded him to an Allegheny County prison. (Tests at a nearby hospital later suggested that Dunlap was not under the influence of alcohol but rather was on illegal narcotics.)

According to the reports, fortunately, no child was injured. That said, stories of near misses like these are all too common these days in places like Hollywood, Pasadena and elsewhere in Los Angeles. Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (a), a misdemeanor Pasadena DUI can be upgraded to a felony charge if the driver causes injury to another person while operating his/her vehicle. California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (b) stipulates that drivers who drive with a BAC over the California limit of 0.08% — and who cause injuries to other people, particularly to children — can be subject to an assortment of punishments including: Court fines, stripping of professional licenses, hiked up insurance rates, forced restitution to injured victims and/or their families, and jail sentences.

To develop a comprehensive response to charges of driving under the influence in Pasadena, it can help significantly to game out defense strategies with a qualified and experienced attorney. Many lawyers can handle basic DUI cases. But it is usually impossible to tell whether your case will be “basic” or quite complicated. Even seemingly cut and dry matters tend to have a way of expanding into vastly more fraught debates over legal subtleties. To that end, you likely want someone on your side who has lots of trial experience and who has served as both a defense attorney and as a prosecutor.

November 23, 2009

Red Flags That Indicate You May Be At Risk for Southern California DUI

by Michael Kraut

Given the potentially devastating penalties that could result if you’re convicted of a Southern California DUI charge, you want to exercise an abundance of caution before getting behind the wheel after you’ve consumed any amount of alcohol. What are some ‘red flags’ that indicate that you might want to turn to a designated driver or take a cab?

1. You fail self administrated “roadside sobriety tests.”

Tests like the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk-the-line test, the Rhomberg test, and the finger-to-the-nose test may be useful for certain individuals in certain situations. But remember that just because you pass any of these tests (or even all of them) with flying colors does not necessarily mean that you are sober and ready to get behind the wheel.

2. You fail a self-administered breathalyzer test.

Breathalyzers can sometimes give a fair bead on your BAC level. As any Southern California DUI attorney will tell you, the normal threshold for DUI in California is a BAC of 0.08%. But just because you blow a BAC of less than that doesn’t mean that you’re necessarily sober and ready to drive. Of course, blowing a BAC of greater than 0.08% doesn’t necessarily mean that you ARE above the state’s legal limit either. In other words, these tests do not have a wonderful track record for accuracy; and in fact false-positive test results often lead to unfair Southern California DUI convictions.

3. You notice dispositional changes.

If you experience symptoms such as bloodshot eyes; an inability to complete sentences; a tendency to slur speech; impaired motor skills; or a retarded ability to complete sentences, definitely think twice before getting behind the wheel. Perhaps more tellingly — if people around you hint or joke that you’re acting drunk — this should be taken as a huge sign to exercise caution.

4. You are under 21.

If you’re a minor and you have even a slight amount of alcohol in your system, you can be tagged for driving under the influence in Southern California. Anyone under age needs to be extra cautious not to get behind the wheel in such situations.

5. You notice any intolerance to alcohol.

Your body’s ability to metabolize alcohol changes. Individuals with diabetes, insulin resistance, or even a common cold can be far more susceptible to the effects of alcohol than healthy individuals, for instance. Other factors that can influence your tolerance include your stress level, your weight, your gender, your level of fatigue, whether or not you consumed foods before drinking, whether you recently consumed narcotics or medications, and so forth.

To summarize, there is no ‘standard candle’ to guide you in all situations. Frustratingly, even if you follow the state’s posted guidelines for responsible driving, you may still potentially encounter legal problems.

Here’s a useful rule of thumb: always exercise an abundance of caution. Be very conservative when you make decisions about whether to drive or not. If you have any doubt about whether you may be too intoxicated to get behind the wheel, don’t drive. Call a cab. Ask a friend to drive you home. But don’t risk potentially injuring yourself, hurting others, destroying property and sidelining your future.

If you or a friend or family member has been arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California, Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers can provide guidance. Attorney Kraut spent many years working as a Los Angeles DUI prosecutor, and he understands how to craft a superior defense as a result of his prosecutorial experience. Attorney Kraut is an alumnus of Harvard Law School, and he’s committed to compassionate and attentive client care.

October 21, 2009

Montana Senator Hit with Felony Charges For Boating Under the Influence — Case May Merit More News Coverage than Even Many Celebrity Southern California DUI Matters

by Michael Kraut

It’s a case that rivals a celebrity Los Angeles DUI escapade — and it took place in Montana, of all places. At the center of the storm is Senator Greg Barkus (R- Montana) who, on the night of August 7th, allegedly drove a boat into a rocky coastline at speeds approaching 45 miles per hour.

Senator Barkus (along with his wife, fellow Congressman Denny Rehberg, and two staffers) were all hurt in the accident. Prosecutors have revealed that Senator Barkus’ blood sample tested at 0.16 percent nearly two hours after the crash occurred. That’s twice Montana’s legal limit for driving (0.08 percent). The senator has been tagged for DUI previously. In 2004, he pled guilty to driving under the influence in the city of Polson, Montana.

If convicted of felony charges against him, the senator could face up to ten years in prison — for each of the three charges — and he could face tens or thousands of dollars worth of fines. He is due to appear in Flathead District Court in Montana on October 22nd for his arraignment.

As a veteran Southern California DUI defense attorney would likely have told the senator, building a rock-ribbed legal defense in a case as complex and public as this requires careful investigation. For instance, a deep analysis might lead the senator to challenge the validity of the results of his blood test. (According to a report in The Billings Gazette, the senator’s passengers did not (at the time) believe him to be intoxicated. Another report revealed that a political rival (a Democrat state representative) ran the lab where the senator’s blood sample was first sent to be analyzed.)

Contrary to many people’s beliefs, blood tests often yield unclear or even biased results. Many factors can cause the test to indicate a higher BAC level than the subject actually might have had. For instance, the chemicals inside the test may have been expired or poorly preserved. The sample may have been misidentified, mishandled, mistested, misinterpreted, or stored improperly. Problems with sterility, refrigeration, and contamination can all influence results.

Of course, given that courts generally consider blood tests to be more reliable than breathalyzer and urine tests, it’s almost always a good idea to retain a top notch Southern California DUI attorney to assist with your case. If you have been arrested and charged with DUI in Los Angeles, connect today with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Attorney Kraut is a Harvard Law School grad and a former LA District Attorney with a tremendous track record. Since he once prosecuted DUI cases for a living, he understands better than most how to shore up potentially shaky defenses and aggressively battle back.