Long Beach DUI Defense Attorney

January 27, 2010

Sentencing Issued in Southern California DUI Manslaughter Case

Last Friday, Corporal Elijah Fergusson (22) was sentenced for Southern California DUI manslaughter for a February 22nd, 2008 car accident that resulted in the death of an area doctor, Dr. Michael Sein.
On the night of the accident, Fergusson, a young marine who had just returned from a tour of duty in Iraq, had been playing drinking games on his marine base. His friends hid his car keys. But then Fergusson got into a phone altercation with his wife, who threatened to leave him. Determined to see her and his young child, the marine allegedly bullied his subordinates into letting him drive a Dodge Cavalier. But he got lost on the way to his house and ended up on McArthur Boulevard, where he slammed into the back of Seins’ vehicle at 74 mph.

Fergusson’s attorneys had argued that the marine got PTSD on his tour of duty in Iraq and that therefore he should be let off with a more lenient sentence. In the end, Judge Ronald Bauer of Superior Court agreed with the Deputy District Attorney’s recommendation of 15 years to life for the DUI manslaughter. (The family of the victim had asked for a 21 year to life term.)

The distinction between Southern California DUI vehicular manslaughter and DUI murder can be subtle. Most non experts assume that charges of vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and DUI murder are interchangeable. But in fact they are extremely different. They carry different penalties and require different burdens of proof.

In California, a vehicular manslaughter charge can be filed if a driver causes a traffic accident due to negligence, gross negligence, or the commission of a traffic infraction. Whether or not you were under the influence when the accident happened is immaterial for this charge.

The charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is far more serious — pursuant to penal code section 191.5(a), the prosecution must prove four points in order for this charge to stick:

1) The suspect was driving under the influence in Southern California with a BAC level of 0.08 percent or more.
2) The driver committed an infraction, misdemeanor, or other act that could lead to death.
3) The infraction, unlawful act or misdemeanor could lead to someone’s death “with gross negligence.”
4) The grossly negligent actions of the driver were the cause of the death of somebody.

DUI murder charges are even more serious. These charges are often called “Watson murders.” If convicted, an individual can face 15 + years to life in jail. Watson murder charges are typically only brought in extreme cases. For instance, if the suspect has numerous DUI convictions and then gets behind the wheel while under the influence and kills someone, he or she might be subjected to a Watson murder charge.

If you or someone you know or love has been charged with vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, or DUI murder in Southern California, you likely need a solid, well versed attorney to represent you.

January 12, 2010

Former TV Host and Radio DJ Busted for Driving Under the Influence in Southern California

by Michael Kraut

The San Diego Union Tribune has reported that a former radio and TV anchor/personality, Allison Ross, was arrested early Sunday morning for driving under the influence in Southern California. Ross was a Southland celebrity in the 1970s and 1980s, during which time she anchored local TV station 8 (KFMB). In the 1990’s, Ross became a traffic reporter and got her own radio show on KNSD (7/39), which she co-hosted with former mayor, Roger Hedgecock.

According to reports, Ross had been driving the wrong way on the 7600 block of Faye Avenue, when she almost plowed headfirst into an oncoming police car. The officer swerved out of the way, then pivoted and followed her onto Kline Street. He pulled her over, administered a field sobriety test, and arrested Ross for misdemeanor DUI. She was taken to a local women’s prison in the nearby town of Santee.

Apparently, this is the 55-year-old’s first ever Southern California misdemeanor DUI charge.

Long Beach DUI law stipulates that a first-time misdemeanor offense can still be punished quite severely. Penalties can include:

* Mandatory interlock ignition device installation (law went into effect January 1, 2010)
* Two full days (48 hours) in jail, minimum; up to six months in prison, maximum
* Minimum of six weeks in DUI alcohol school (max, nine months)
* Suspension of Southern California driver’s license — license can be suspended for a whole year with no restricted license permitted
* Fines and court costs. The maximum fine is “only” $1000, but the court costs can significantly exceed this number.
* Probation. You may have to check in with a probation officer on a regular basis and/or abide by other court-imposed limitations on your freedoms.

To respond effectively to charges of misdemeanor DUI in Long Beach or elsewhere in Southern California, you generally need superior legal help. Obviously, you have the right to defend yourself in court alone if you choose, but given the significant consequences for your future if you don’t muster the best possible defense, it makes sense to connect with a knowledgeable, passionate, and credible lawyer today.

January 4, 2010

New Year’s Eve Arrests for DUI in Los Angeles Way Up over 2009 Numbers

by Michael Kraut

According to California Highway Patrol (CHP) statistics, 108 people were arrested for DUI in Los Angeles County over New Year’s Eve (from 6:01 PM on 12/31/09 through 6 AM on 01/01/2010). In 2009 — one year ago — only 430 people were arrested. These trends were statewide. In 2009, 430 people were arrested in all of California for driving over the influence on New Year’s Eve; in 2010, 527 people were busted.

But although state arrest numbers went up by 97, crash fatality numbers went way down. In 2009, 11 people died on California’s freeways on New Year’s Eve; in 2010, only six died.

The New Year’s Eve arrests followed on the heels of a statewide campaign to crack down on driving under the influence in Southern California and Northern California. As of December 28, 2009, over 1,400 people had been snagged in L.A. County alone for DUI violations. And over the Christmas holiday weekend, the CHP arrested over 200 people in LA for driving under the influence.

CHP officials have trumpeted these numbers as evidence that their statewide crackdown saved lives and kept California roads safer.

When CHP agents arrest people for driving under the influence in Long Beach, what precisely does that mean, legally speaking? California Vehicle Code Sections 23152 (a) and 23152 (b) spell out precisely what constitutes a DUI in Southern California. Section 23152 (a) stipulates that a driver operating a car, truck or other motor vehicle on state roads while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be subject to arrest; if convicted, he or she will face an array of unpleasant punishments, which can include driver’s license suspension, jail time, court costs and fines, points on a driver’s license, and now — as of 01/01/2010 — a mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device (IID) even for first time Long Beach or Glendale DUI offenders.

Section 23152 (b) stipulates that it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle if your blood alcohol concentration is above 0.08%.

Crafting a methodical and proper legal defense to charges of driving under the influence in Long Beach (or elsewhere in Southern California) can prove immensely challenging, even if the facts are on your side.

December 26, 2009

Eighteen Day Southern California DUI Crackdown Begins

by Michael Kraut

An epic holiday Southern California DUI crackdown began on December 18. According to a California Office of Traffic Safety press statement, 250 sobriety checkpoints will take place across California’s highways and byways from the 18th to the 3rd of January. California Highway Patrol Commissioner Joe Farrow said that the CHP will work hand in glove with 400 agencies across CA to reduce incidences of driving under the influence over the holidays.

All told, the CHP and other groups organized 1,700 total checkpoints in California in 2009. Next year, the police plan to an increase this number by 47 percent to more than 2,500 checkpoints.

In 2008, more than 214,000 people in California were arrested for driving under the influence — a high watermark for the decade and the highest number of DUI arrests since the early ‘90s. In 2008, DUIs led to 28,000 serious injuries and over 1,000 deaths, according to CHP statistics. That said, the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) — via its Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) — found that DUI related deaths in the state have declined since 2005.

In the most egregious Los Angeles DUI deaths, a defendant can be charged with DUI murder. If convicted of this charge of second degree murder, a defendant can get 15 years to life in jail. But a DUI murder — also often referred to as a “Watson Murder” — can be difficult for prosecutors to win. For instance, prosecutors must show that the driver demonstrated “implied malice” and may have to show that he/she violated a signed statement called “the Watson advisement.”

More often, if you hit and kill someone while driving DUI in Los Angeles, you’ll be charged with manslaughter under the California Vehicular Manslaughter Law (penal code 191.5(a)).

Defenses to Pasadena DUI manslaughter and murder charges can be developed — after all, the prosecution has to meet a very high burden of proof to win these counts — but if you or a loved one faces such charges, it may behoove you to consult ASAP with a qualified, experienced attorney.

October 27, 2009

Terminator Star Taken to Task for Southern California DUI; Bicyclist Injured

by Michael Kraut

Thomas Dekker — the star of the short-lived TV series: “Terminator: the Sarah Connor Chronicles,” was arrested on Wednesday for driving under the influence in Los Angeles. According to a report from the celebrity blog TMZ.com, the 21-year-old actor slammed into a bicyclist and was booked on charges of felony DUI in Southern California. The accident took place at around 9 PM in the San Fernando Valley. Dekker’s being held on a bail of $100,000.

It’s unclear from reports how serious the bicyclist’s injuries are; nor is it clear whether Dekker himself suffered injuries or whether any property was damaged.

Given the serious consequences associated with a conviction for felony DUI, Dekker will likely require the services of a qualified and experienced Los Angeles DUI attorney.

California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (a) mandates that, in the event that a DUI driver causes injury to another person or persons, his charge may be elevated from a misdemeanor to a felony. California Vehicle Code Section 23153 (b) outlines many of the penalties that can result from a felony DUI conviction. These can include fines and court costs, jail time, forced restitution to victims, and loss of other privileges and licenses.

That being said, a felony injury Los Angeles DUI conviction is by no means guaranteed. The prosecution must meet a heavy burden of proof. First of all, the prosecution must show that the defendant had been driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or greater. Second, the prosecution must show that the defendant had committed some act of negligence or traffic violation that caused the accident that resulted in the injury.

To illustrate this point, let’s consider a scenario in which a driver is DUI. But then a bicyclist blows through a stop sign and drives right in front of his car. The cyclist gets hit and injured. In this case, the driver can be convicted of a misdemeanor DUI, since he was under the influence. But he shouldn’t be convicted of a felony injury DUI, since he had been obeying the traffic laws; the bicyclist provoked the accident by driving negligently.

As you can see, DUI legal issues can come become incredibly complicated. To make sense of your rights and obligations, you need to analyze and investigate. That’s why many defendants trust attorney Michael Kraut to provide savvy guidance. Prior to representing criminal defendants, Attorney Kraut spent years prosecuting Los Angeles DUI cases — essentially working for the “other side” — and he leverages his intimate knowledge of the prosecutorial system to deliver superior results time and again.

October 21, 2009

Montana Senator Hit with Felony Charges For Boating Under the Influence — Case May Merit More News Coverage than Even Many Celebrity Southern California DUI Matters

by Michael Kraut

It’s a case that rivals a celebrity Los Angeles DUI escapade — and it took place in Montana, of all places. At the center of the storm is Senator Greg Barkus (R- Montana) who, on the night of August 7th, allegedly drove a boat into a rocky coastline at speeds approaching 45 miles per hour.

Senator Barkus (along with his wife, fellow Congressman Denny Rehberg, and two staffers) were all hurt in the accident. Prosecutors have revealed that Senator Barkus’ blood sample tested at 0.16 percent nearly two hours after the crash occurred. That’s twice Montana’s legal limit for driving (0.08 percent). The senator has been tagged for DUI previously. In 2004, he pled guilty to driving under the influence in the city of Polson, Montana.

If convicted of felony charges against him, the senator could face up to ten years in prison — for each of the three charges — and he could face tens or thousands of dollars worth of fines. He is due to appear in Flathead District Court in Montana on October 22nd for his arraignment.

As a veteran Southern California DUI defense attorney would likely have told the senator, building a rock-ribbed legal defense in a case as complex and public as this requires careful investigation. For instance, a deep analysis might lead the senator to challenge the validity of the results of his blood test. (According to a report in The Billings Gazette, the senator’s passengers did not (at the time) believe him to be intoxicated. Another report revealed that a political rival (a Democrat state representative) ran the lab where the senator’s blood sample was first sent to be analyzed.)

Contrary to many people’s beliefs, blood tests often yield unclear or even biased results. Many factors can cause the test to indicate a higher BAC level than the subject actually might have had. For instance, the chemicals inside the test may have been expired or poorly preserved. The sample may have been misidentified, mishandled, mistested, misinterpreted, or stored improperly. Problems with sterility, refrigeration, and contamination can all influence results.

Of course, given that courts generally consider blood tests to be more reliable than breathalyzer and urine tests, it’s almost always a good idea to retain a top notch Southern California DUI attorney to assist with your case. If you have been arrested and charged with DUI in Los Angeles, connect today with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Attorney Kraut is a Harvard Law School grad and a former LA District Attorney with a tremendous track record. Since he once prosecuted DUI cases for a living, he understands better than most how to shore up potentially shaky defenses and aggressively battle back.